Saturday, 12 October 2013

CHAPTER NINE : NATURE & USES OF ACCOUNTING RATIOS

CHAPTER NINE :
NATURE & USES OF ACCOUNTING RATIOS

Ratio analysis is a tool for interpreting and analyzing financial statements. It helps management in providing an overall plan to achieve profitability and maximization
of shareholder value. Ratio can be classified into four main groups as shown below:

Type
Goal
Examples


Profitability Ratios

  Measure performance of the  
  company and its managers
1. Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
2. Gross Profit as % of sales
3. Net Profit as % of sales
4. Return on Assets (ROA)

        Management      
        Efficiency Ratios

   Measure the efficiency of assets usage of the company
1.Stock (Inventory) Turnover
2. Debtors (Accounts Receivable) Collection Period
3. Creditors (Accounts Payable) Payment Period

Financial Ratios

       Measure the financial structure and stability of the company
1. Equity to assets ratio
2. Current Ratio
3. Liquid Ratio




Investment Ratios


Measure the extend of the relationship of the number of ordinary shares and their price to the profit, dividends and assets of the company
1. Earning per share (EPS)
2. Price / Earning Ratio
3. Dividend Cover
4. Dividend Yield
5. Earning Yield
6. Debt Ratio
7. Times-Interest – Earned Ratio
8. Gearing
9. Equity Gearing


Profitability Ratios

These measure the performance of a company and its managers. They indicate how efficiently the organization has used its available resources. The profitability ratios are normally presented as percentages and, in generally, the higher the profitability percentage, the better is the aspect of the organization’s performance to which the ratio relates.

Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) : This measures the size of the profit figure relevant to the size of the business, size being express in terms of the quantity of capital employed by the business. It reflects the earning power of the business operations. This is also known as the primary ratio because it is often the most important measure of profitability. It is measure in several ways.

1. ROCE based on total capital employed in the business is calculated as follows:

ROCE = ( PBIT / Capital Employed ) x 100

2. ROCE based on equity shareholder’s capital employed is calculated as follows:

ROCE = ( Profit after tax & preference dividend / Ordinary Share Capital + Reserves ) x 100

Gross Profit-Sales % = (Gross Profit / Sales) x 100

Net Profit as % of Sales = Net Profit / Sales x 100

Return on Assets (ROA) : This measures the success a company has in using its assets to earn a profit. It is calculated as follows:

ROA = (Net Profit + Interest Expense) / Total (Average) Assets ) / 100

Management Efficiency

This measures the efficiency of asset usage. It includes the following ratio types:

Stock Turnover (Period): This ratio measures the average length of time during which a firm holds the stock. A long holding period, implying high stock level relative to the amount of goods sold, has some advantages, for example – it reduces the risk of stock- out and the resultant inability to satisfy demand, and it provides more scope for bulk buying which may produce quantity discount and other economics of scale. Alternatively it might indicate the existence of slow-moving or obsolete stock. It is calculated as follows:

Stock Turnover (Period) = (Average Stock / Cost of goods sold) x 365 days

The stock turnover can also be expressed in times as follows:

This measures the number of times a company sells its average level of stock during a year. A high rate of turnover indicates relative ease in selling stock, whereas a low times turnover indicates difficulty in selling. However, a higher value can mean that the

business is not keeping enough stock on hand, and inadequate stock can result in lost sales if the company cannot fill a customer’s order. Therefore, a business strives for the most profitable rate of stock turnover, not necessarily the highest. The stock turnover (times) is calculated as follows:

Stock Turnover (Times) = Cost of goods sold / Average Stock = X times

Debtor Collection Period : This measures the average length of time taken by debtors to pay amount due to the business. It is an important aspect of the assessment of management’s ability to control working capital. A long debtor collection period have disadvantages. For instance, the business may incur high interest cost on the working capital to finance debtors, and so run the risk of incurring bad debts. It is expressed in days and is calculated as follows:

Debtors’ Collection Period = (Average Trade Debtors / Credit Sales) x 365 days

The debtor collection period can also be expressed in times :

Debtors’ Collection (Times) = Credit Sales / Average Trade Debtors = X times

Creditor Turnover : Measures the company’s ability to pay cash to its suppliers. A long creditor payment period has an advantage to the company. This is because it serves as a source of financing to the company. The creditors’ payment period is computed as follows:

Creditors’ Payment Period = (Trade Creditors / Cost of Sales) x 365 days

It can also be expressed in times as follows:

Creditors Turnover (Times) = Cost of Sales / Average Trade Creditors = X times

NB : If the cost of sales figure is not given then use the purchase figure as a proxy.

The Length of Working Capital Cycles (days) = Debtors Collection Period + Stock
Turnover Period – Creditors Payment Period

Financial Ratio

These ratios measure the financial structure of the company. These ratios include:

Current Ratio : Indicates the business’s ability to meet its short term cash obligations (current liabilities) out of its current assets without having to raise finance by borrowing, using more shares, or selling fixed assets. It is calculated as follows:


Current Ratio = Current Asset / Current Liabilities = A : 1

Liquid Ratio : This is also known as Acid Test / Quick Ratio. It tells us whether the firm business could pay all its current liabilities if they come due immediately. It is a more stringent test of a firm’s ability to pay its debt as they fall due. This is computed as follows:

Liquid/Acid Test/Quick Ratio = (Current Asset–Stock)/Current Liabilities = A : 1

Investment Ratio

These ratios measure the relationship of the number of ordinary shares and their price to the profit, dividend and assets of the company.

Earning Per Share (EPS) : This is the most widely quoted of all financial statistics. The EPS is the only ratio that must appear on the face of the profit and loss account. It is the amount of net profit per share of the company’s issued ordinary share. Preference dividends are subtracted from net profit because the preference shareholders have prior claim to their dividends. It is calculated as follows:

EPS = (Net Profit – Preference Dividends) / No. of Ordinary Shares Issued = ₤X

Price / Earning (P/E) Ratio: This is the market price of an ordinary share of the company’s earning per share. It shows how long it would take for the investors to recover his outlay at a particular EPS. It is measure as follows:

Price / Earning Ratio = Market Price / Earning Per Share 

Dividend Yield : Measures the ratio of dividends per share to the share’s market price per share. This ratio gives the percentage of a share’s market value that is returned annually as dividends, an important concern of shareholders. It is computed as follows:

Dividend Yield = Dividend Per Share / Market Price Per Share 


Dividend Cover : Shows by how much earnings should fall for dividend not to be paid. It is calculated as follows: 

Dividend Cover = Total Earnings/ Total Dividend   OR   EPS / Dividend per share

Earning Yield : This expresses the earning per share as percentage of the current share price. It is computed as follows:

Earning Yield = EPS/ Current Share Price x 100  
                                                              OR  
1 / PE Ratio (This would implies the earning yield is merely the reciprocal of the PE ratio

Long-Term Solvency : This is concern with the ability of a company to survive over many years. Survival of a company may be affected by the long-term financial commitments. These commitments are often related to the manner in which the company finances its operations.

Debt Ratio : This tells us about the proportion of the company’s assets that it has financed with debt. If the debt ratio is 1, then debt has been used to finance all the assets. Similarly a debt ratio of 0.5 means that the company has used debt to finance half of its assets and that the owners of the business have financed the other half. The higher the debt ratio, the higher the strain on the firm, to pay interest each year and the principal amount at maturity. It is calculated as follows:

Debt Ratio = Total Liabilities/ Total Assets 

Times – Interest –Earned Ratio : This relates net profit to interest expense. It indicates the ability of the company to pay interest expense. This ratio also measures the number of times that the net profit can cover interest expense. It is computed as follows:

Times-Interest –Earned Ratio = Net Profit Before Interest / Interest Expense


Gearing = Debt / Capital Employed

Equity Gearing = (Preference Share Capital + Loans) / Ordinary Share Capital + Reserves

Limitations of Ratio Analysis

In interpreting the financial statements of companies we should always bear in mind that the analysis are based on profit and loss accounts and balance sheets which are subject to

all the limitations of historical cost accounting. Inflation, specific price changes and differing bases of valuation are likely to distort comparisons, whether cross sectional or time series.

Report / Memo Writing

Exam questions sometimes require us to write either a report or a memo for superior. Thus before concluding our discussion on ratio analysis it would be useful for us to know the required Report / Memo format. The format is as outlined below:




REPORT / MEMO

To: Chief Accountant, TALL Plc

From : Accountant, TALL Plc

Date : 01st January 2007

Subject : Trend Analysis

Introduction : We will be required to state the requirement in the question in this introduction and also make mention of any assumption(s) that we may make in our discussion and / calculation.

Body : We commend on our results obtained in our calculation(s). The results obtained are  used to answer the requirement(s) in the question. If we are given the financial statement(s) of a company for two period then we should make comparison of the similar ratio results. We may show our workings in the body or just use an appendix. The appendix will serve as our work sheet and reference should be made to it in our discussion. If we choose to use appendix then it should be shown at the end of our report (meaning that the appendix would not be part of our report).However, due to exam pressure it is sometimes recommended to show all workings in the body of our report. This helps to save time in the exam hall.

Conclusion : This ends the report and we will be required to make our final comment as per our discussion in the body above. In short we give answer to the requirement stated in the question in our conclusion.

RATIO FORMULA LIST
RATIO
FORMULA
HOW IS IT PRESENTED?
Profitability Ratios


1. Gross Profit as % of Sales (Gross Profit Margin)
(Gross Profit ÷Sales) x 100
 The answer is always expressed in % terms
2. Net Profit as % of Sales (Net Profit Margin)
(Net Profit ÷Sales) x 100
 The answer is always expressed in % terms
3. Return On Assets (ROA)
((Net Profit + Interest Expense) ÷ Total  Assets ) x 100
It is also expressed in %. And it measures the success a company has in using its assets to earn a profit.
4. ROCE
(PBIT ÷ Capital Employed) x 100. where capital employed is just the business Net Assets.
It measures the size of the profit figure relevant to the size of the business, size being express in terms of the quantity of capital employed by the business. It reflects the earning power of the business operations. It is also expressed in %.



Financial Ratios


1. Current Ratio
Current Assets ÷ Current Liabilities
The answer is expressed in the form A : 1, where A  is just the result of CA ÷ CL. Indicates the business’s ability to meet its short term cash obligations (current liabilities) out of its current assets without having to raise finance by borrowing, using more shares, or selling fixed assets.
2. Liquid / Acid Test / Quick Ratio
(Current Assets – Stock) ÷ Current Liabilities
This is also expressed in the form A : 1, where A  is just the result of CA ÷ CL. It tells us whether the firm business could pay all its current liabilities if they come due immediately.





Management Efficiency Ratios


1.  (a) Stock Turnover (Period)
(Average Stock ÷ Cost of goods sold) x 365 days
This ratio measures the average length of time during which a firm holds the stock. A long holding period, implying high stock level relative to the amount of goods sold. It is expressed in days.
  (b) Stock Turnover (Times)
Cost of goods sold ÷ Average Stock
This measures the number of times a company sells its average level of stock during a year. A high rate of turnover indicates relative ease in selling stock, whereas a low times turnover indicates difficulty in selling. It is expressed in times , i.e. K times, where is just the result of the division.
2. (a) Debtors Collection (Period)
(Average Trade Debtors ÷ Credit Sales) x 365 days
This measures the average length of time taken by debtors to pay amount due to the business. It is expressed in days.
    (b) Debtors  Collection (Times)
Credit Sales ÷ Average Trade Debtors
 K times
3. (a) Creditors Payment (Period)
(Trade Creditors ÷ Cost of Sales) x 365 days

If the cost of sales figure is not given then use the purchase figure as a proxy.
Measures the company’s ability to pay cash to its suppliers. A long creditor payment period has an advantage to the company. It is expressed in days.
   (b) Creditors Payment (Times)
Cost of Sales ÷ Average Trade Creditors
K times



Length of Working Capital Cycles (days)
Debtors Collection Period + Stock
Turnover Period – Creditors Payment Period






Investment Ratios


1. Earnings per Shares (EPS)
(Net Profit – Preference Dividends) ÷ No. of Ordinary Shares Issued
It is in this form ₤X. This is the most widely quoted of all financial statistics. The EPS is the only ratio that must appear on the face of the profit and loss account. It is the amount of net profit per share of the company’s issued ordinary share. Preference dividends are subtracted from net profit because the preference shareholders have prior claim to their dividends.
2. Price / Earning (P/E) Ratio
Market Price ÷ Earning Per Share 
This is the market price of an ordinary share of the company’s earning per share. It shows how long it would take for the investors to recover his outlay at a particular EPS.
3. Dividend Yield
(Dividend Per Share ÷ Market Price Per Share) x 100
Measures the ratio of dividends per share to the share’s market price per share. This ratio gives the percentage of a share’s market value that is returned annually as dividends, an important concern of shareholders.
4. Dividend Cover
(Total Earnings ÷ Total Dividend) x 100   OR    (EPS  ÷ Dividend per share) x 100
Shows by how much earnings should fall for dividend not to be paid.
5. Earning Yield
 (EPS ÷ Current Share Price) x 100  
OR
(1 ÷ PE Ratio)  , This would implies the earning yield is merely the reciprocal of the PE ratio
This expresses the earning per share as percentage of the current share price.
6. Debt Ratio
Total Liabilities ÷ Total Assets
This tells us about the proportion of the company’s assets that it has financed with debt. If the debt ratio is 1, then debt has been used to finance all the assets.
7. Gearing
(Debt ÷ Capital Employed) x 100
This is expressed in %.






Limitations of Ratios
In interpreting the financial statements of companies we should always bear in mind that the analysis are based on profit and loss accounts and balance sheets which are subject to all the limitations of historical cost accounting. Inflation, specific price changes and differing bases of valuation are likely to distort comparisons, whether cross sectional or time series.




Worked Examples

1. Bond Ltd and Fraser Ltd

Bond Ltd and Fraser Ltd are companies operating in a similar market. Your manager has asked you to help her review the performance of both companies from their financial statements which are summarized.


Profit and Loss accounts for the year ended 31 October 2008

GMD
GMD
Sales
23,800
24,000
Cost of sales
17,850
16,800
Gross Profit
5,950
7,200
Expenses
2,500
4,800
Profit before tax
3,450
2,400
Tax on profit
  900
  600
Profit after tax
2,550
1,800

1,000
 900
Retained Profit
1,550
 900


Balance Sheet as at 31 October 2008
Bond Limited
Fraser Limited

GMD’000
GMD’000
GMD’000
GMD’000
Fixed Assets

15,000

24,000
Current Assets
    Stock
    Debtors
    Bank

500
    2,000
       100


1,200
   600
-


2,600

1,800

Current Liabilities
    Creditors
    Overdraft
    Tax

775
-
900


150
  55
600


1,675

805

Net Current Assets

 925

 995


15,925

24,995
Debentures

    300

  1,000
Net Assets

       15,625

23,995
Capital and reserves




   GMD1 Ordinary shares

12,000

20,000
   Reserves

 3,625

  3,995


15,625

23,995



Required :

(a) Calculate four profitability ratios and two liquidity ratios for Bond Ltd and Fraser Ltd. Show all workings.                                            (12 marks)

(b) Comment briefly on the performance of two companies as indicated by the ratios you have calculated in Part (a).                               (8 marks)
                                                                           (20 Marks)

Answer : Bond Ltd and Fraser Ltd
Ratio
Formulae
Bond Limited
Fraser Limited
Profitability Ratios



Gross profit %
(Gross profit ÷ Sales) x 100
(5,950 ÷ 23,800) x 100 = 25%
(7,200 ÷ 24,000) x 100 = 30%
Net Profit %
(Net profit ÷ Sales) x 100
(3,450 ÷ 23,800) x 100 = 14%
(2,400÷24,000) x 100 = 10%
Earning on capital employed
(Net Profit after tax ÷ No. of Ordinary shares
2,500 ÷ 12,000 = 21p
1,800 ÷ 20,000 = 9p
Return on capital employed
(Net profit ÷ Capital employed) x 100
(3,450 ÷ 15,625) x 100 = 22%
(2,400 ÷ 23,995) x 100 = 10%
Liquidity ratios



Current ratio
(Current Assets ÷ Current Liabilities) : 1
(2,600 ÷ 1,675) :1 = 1.6 : 1
(1,800 ÷ 805) : 1 = 2.2 : 1
Acid test ratio
((Current Assets – Stock) ÷ Current Liabilities) : 1
(2,100 ÷ 1,675) :1 = 1.3 : 1
(600 ÷ 805) : 1 = 0.7 : 1


(b) Profitability ratio

Gross profit percentage : Fraser Ltd has a higher gross profit percentage than Bond Ltd. The companies both operate in a similar market and have similar turnovers, so it is unclear why there is a difference. Possibly Fraser is better at keeping supplier costs.

Net profit percentage : Bond does better than Fraser on net profit percentage, reversing the gross profit percentage finding. The company is obviously better at controlling its expenses, which are around half those of Fraser.  

Earning per share : Bond Ltd’s EPS figure is twice that of Fraser Ltd, suggesting on the face of it that it is a better investment. The difference is mainly due to the number of shares by which the earnings figure is being divided. However, Bond Ltd’s post tax profit is also higher than that of Fraser Ltd. We do not know the market value of the shares, which would be an important factor when deciding to invest.

Return on capital employed : Bond Ltd’s return on capital employed is double that of Fraser Ltd. Fraser Ltd has more money invested, in both shares and loans, but is not making an effective use of the capital employed.

Liquidity Ratios

Current ratio : Both companies have sufficient assets to cover their liabilities. The current ratio of Bond Ltd is not as high as that of Fraser Ltd. However, it is important to look at the individual companies of working capital.

Both Ltd’s cash position (GMD100,000) is more favourable than Fraser Ltd’s GMD55,000 overdraft).

Acid test ratio : Much of Fraser Ltd’s working capital is tied up in stock. When this is taken out to give the acid test ratio, Bond Ltd’s is better. Fraser Ltd may be storing up liquidity or cash flow problems.

Conclusion : Overall Bond Ltd looks to be the better performer, both in term of liquidity and profitability. It would be helpful to have more background information about the market in which the companies operate, for example industry average ratios, and also to see the trend compared with previous years.


2. Hester Ltd

A business as you to invest in Hester Ltd. He has watched the company steadily grow over the last three years and considers it a good investment. You have requested the following financial information so that you can draw your own conclusions.



Hester Ltd
Balances as at end of ………


2006
2005
2008

GMD’000
GMD’000
GMD’000
Sales
1,000
1,250
1,500
Cost of sales
(700)
(850)
(975)
Gross profit
300
400
  525
Distribution costs
(55)
(75)
(100)
Administration expenses
(100)
(200)
(300)
Profit on ordinary activities before interest
145
125
125
Interest payable
(10)
(15)
(30)
Profit on ordinary activities before taxation
135
110
95
Taxation on ordinary activities
(30)
(25)
(25)
Profit on ordinary activities after taxation
105
85
70
Less proposed dividends
(50)
(35)
(35)
Retained profit for the year
   55
50
35
Debentures
100
150
300
Share capital : 500,000 ordinary shares of GMD1 each
500
500
500
Share premium account
  20
  20
  20
Profit and loss account
250
300
335

870
970
1,155

Financial Performance Ratios
Gross Profit Percentage
30.0%
32.0%
35.0%
Operating Profit Percentage
14.5%
10.0%
8.3%
Return on Capital Employed
16.7%
12.9%
10.8%


Required

(a) Identify and comment on the key financial trends as indicated by the above information.    (7 marks)

(b) Calculate the following ratios for Hester Ltd for 2008 only and explain the purpose of the ration.

(i) Return on shareholders’ capital
(ii) Capital gearing ratio
(iii) Earning per share
(iv) Dividend cover.



Answer : Hester Ltd

(a) Hester Ltd is clearly a growth company with sales value increasing by 50% over the three years. Gross profit has also increased over the period indicating either that a premium is being added to the selling price or that cost of sales has increased perhaps due to bulk purchase discounts.

The increase in activity of the company has also brought about a disproportionate increase in expenses. Distribution costs have almost cost doubled over the three years

whilst administrative costs have tripled. These huge increases will need to be investigated and controlled by management.

The increase expenses have caused the fall in operating profit percentage from 14.5% (given) in 2006 to only 8.3% (also given) in 2008. A similar decrease in return on capital employed from 16.7% to 10.8% over the period would also indicate that despite the issue of the debentures the funds are not being used as profitable as they once were.

A further effect of the decrease in profitability has been the reduction in proposed dividend from GMD50,000 in 2006 to GMD35,000 for the next two years. However even with the significant decreased in dividend the proportion of retained earning for use within the company has fallen dramatically.

(b) (i) Return on shareholders’ capital = (Profit on ordinary activities before tax ÷ Share capital and reserves) x 100% = (95 ÷ (500+20+335)) x 100% = 11.1%
    
Purpose : The return on shareholders’ capital measures profitability from the
Perspective of the shareholders. It shows the return that the company is making on the investment that is owned by the shareholders i.e. their share capital and retained profits in the form of reserves.

      (ii) Capital gearing ratio = (Prior charge capital÷ Total capital) x 100% = (300÷1,155) x 100% = 26%    OR

            = (Prior charge÷Share capital and reserves) x 100%

            = (300÷855) x 100% = 35%

Purpose: This ratio show the proportion of the financing of a company that is made up of prior charge capital. Prior charge capital that requires a fixed return to be paid and will normally consist of preference shares and debentures. The higher a company’s capital gearing then the greater will be the amount of fixed return that must be paid each year before there is any profit for shareholders. A highly geared company is therefore more likely to run the risk of earning insufficient profits to service all of its prior charge capital.  

(iii) Earnings per share = (Profit on ordinary activity after tax ÷Number of ordinary shares in issue) = GMD70÷500 =14 pence  

Purpose : This ratio shows how much profit there is available for each ordinary share. This is an important financial indicator for comparison year on year and between companies.

(iv) Dividend cover = Profit on ordinary activities after tax ÷ Dividend for the year = 70÷35 = 2 times

Purpose: This ratio gives an indication of how safe the ordinary shareholders’ dividend is. A low dividend cover means that the dividend is high compared to the profit available and this may indicate problems with paying the dividend in future.

PRACTICE QUESTIONS :

1. Paper Ltd

Paper Ltd trades in the distribution of paper products. You have been given the following balance sheets as at 31 December and some addition information.

2008
2009

GMD’000
GMD’000
Fixed assets at cost
850
1,272
Less depreciation
400
550

450
722
Stock
75
130
Debtors
98
150
Bank
75
0

698
1,002
Trade creditors
(80)
(130)
Taxation
(30)
(55)
Dividend
(20)
(20)
Overdraft
0
(50)

568
747
Debentures
(70)
(190)

498
557
Issued share capital (5p shares)
200
200
Profit and loss account
298
357

498
557


Extracts from the profit and loss accounts for the year ended

1998
1999

GMD’000
GMD’000
Sales (all on credit)
880
1200
Gross profit
380
532
Overheads
300
370
Net Profit
80
162
Interest
10
 38
Profit before tax
70
124
Tax
30
 45

40
79
Dividend
20
20

20
59


Required:

(a) Your manager has asked you to calculate and commend on the following ratios, for 2008 and 2009 years, for Paper Ltd:

(a)    Gearing ration;
(ii) Interest cover;
(iii) Stock turnover;
(iv) return on capital employed;
(v) Debtors payment period;
(vi) Quick / Acid test ratio.

Give your workings and clearly state the definitions used for each ratio.  (9 Marks)

(b) Prepare your manager a memorandum that explains the limitation of ratio analysis. (6 Marks)


2. Moran

Your manager has asked you to analyse the financial performance of Moran Ltd. You have been given the following summarized financial information.

MORAN Ltd
Financial Year Ended 30 April

2000
2001
2002

GMD’000
GMD’000
GMD’000
Sales
75
120
200
Cost of sales
40
70
130
Gross profit
35
50
70
Distribution & administration expenses
6
20
38
Profit before tax
29
30
32
Tax
5
6
7
Profit after tax
24
24
25
Dividends
4
4
5
Retained Profit
20
20
20




Fixed assets
30
60
100
Current assets:



  Stock
15
20
50
  Debtors
10
40
45
  Cash and bank
70
30
5

95
90
100
Current liabilities:



  Creditors
(5)
(10)
(40)
Net current assets
90
80
60
Net Assets
120
140
160



Capital and Reserves



GMD1 Ordinary shares
100
100
100
Reserves
 20
 40
 60

120
140
160


Required

(a) Identify and comment on the main trends as shown by the above financial information.           (5 Marks)
( Use the figures provided above – do not calculate ratios to answer this part of the question.)

(b) State the further information that would be useful to help interpret Moran Ltd’s financial position.       (3 Marks)

( c) Calculate the following ratios for Moran Ltd for the year ended 30 April 2002 only. Clearly state the definitions used for each ratio.
(i)  Return on capital employed
(ii) Quick / acid test ratio
(iii) Stock turnover (days)
(iv) Debtors collection period
(v) Earnings per share              (7 Marks)


3. Lewis and Gordon

You have been provided with the following information for Lewis Ltd and Gordon Ltd which are retail companies selling similar products in a similar market.
Ratio
Lewis Ltd
Gordon Ltd
Gross profit percentage
18%
30%
Net profit percentage
10%
10%
Return on capital employed (ROCE)
16%
19%
Stock turnover
21 days
40 days
Average settlement period for debtors
23 days
67 days
Average settlement period for creditors
39 days
44 days

Required

(a) State how each ratio is calculated.     (3 Marks)

(b) Comment on the performance of the two companies as indicated by the ratios.
                                                                     (8 Marks)

( c) Briefly explain what further information about the companies would be helpful in assessing their performance.                           (4 Marks)
                                                                         (15 Marks)    

4. Gilson and Warner  

You have been asked to analyse the performance of two sole traders who run similar businesses. Their financial statements for the year ending 31 October 2009 are given below.
John Gilson
David Wardner

GMD’000
GMD’000
GMD’000
GMD’000
TRADING & PROFIT AND LOSS




Sakes

140

200
Less cost of goods sold :




   Opening stock
36

40

   Purchases
85

      137

 
121

      177

Less Closing stock
  18

45



103

132
Gross profit

 37

 68
 Less depreciation
3

5

  Other expenses
16

11

  

19

16
Net profit

18

52







                                                    
                                                      BALANCE SHEET
John Gilson
David Wardner

GMD’000
GMD’000
GMD’000
GMD’000
Fixed assets:




  Fixture and fittings
18

35

  Less depreciation
14

11



4

24
Current assets:




  Stock
18

45

 Debtors
44

35

 Bank
9

4


71

84

Current liabilities: Creditors
19

50

  Net current assets

52

34
 Capital




 Balance at start of year

53

70
 Add net profit

18

52


71

122
Less drawings

15

64


56

64








Required

Your manager has asked you to prepare two things.

(a) A table of accounting ratios (with supporting workings) which compares the profitability, liquidity and efficiency of the two business.        (6 Marks)

(b) A brief report which comments on the accounting ratios you have calculated. (9 Marks)
                                                                                                    (15 Marks)
5. Holden Ltd

The directors of Holden Ltd wish to compare the company’s most recent financial statements with those of the previous year. The company’s financial statements are given below:





Holden Ltd
Income Statements
                                                                  Year ended
31 March    
    2008
31 March    
    2007

GMD’000
GMD’000
Sakes
1,800
2,500
Cost of sales (see note below)
(1,200)
(1,800)
Gross Profit
600
700
Distribution costs
(160)
(250)
Administrative expenses 
(200)
(200)
Profit from operations
240
250
Finance cost
(50)
(50)
Profit before tax
 190
 200
Income tax expense
(44)
(46)
Net Profit for the period 
146
154





Note: Cost of sales figure are made up of as follows:
31 March    
    2008
31 March    
    2007

GMD’000
GMD’000
Opening inventory
180
200
Purchases (all on credit)
1,220
1,960

1,400
2,160
Less Closing inventory
(200)
(360)
Cost of sales
1,200
1,800
31 March    
    2008
31 March    
    2007

GMD’000
GMD’000
Opening inventory
180
200
Purchases (all on credit)
1,220
1,960

1,400
2,160
Less Closing inventory
(200)
(360)
Cost of sales
1,200
1,800






BALANCE SHEET AS AT
31 March 2008
31 March 2007

GMD’000
GMD’000
GMD’000
GMD’000
Non-current assets – cost
3,100

3,674

 Less depreciation
1,214

1,422

 

1,886

2,252
Current assets:




  Inventory
200

360

 Trade receivables
400

750

 Cash at bank 
100

120


700

1,230

Current liabilities:




    Trade payables
210

380

    Sundry
260

430

    Income tax
  48

  50


518

860

Net current assets

182

370
 Non- current liabilities: 10% Loan notes


(500)


(500)
Net Assets

1,568

2,122
 Capital and reserves




 Issued ordinary share capital *

1,000

1,200
 Share premium account*

  400

   600
 Accumulated profits

  168

   322


1,568

2,122
31 March 2008
31 March 2007

GMD’000
GMD’000
GMD’000
GMD’000
Non-current assets – cost
3,100

3,674

 Less depreciation
1,214

1,422

 

1,886

2,252
Current assets:




  Inventory
200

360

 Trade receivables
400

750

 Cash at bank 
100

120


700

1,230

Current liabilities:




    Trade payables
210

380

    Sundry
260

430

    Income tax
  48

  50


518

860

Net current assets

182

370
 Non- current liabilities: 10% Loan notes


(500)


(500)
Net Assets

1,568

2,122
 Capital and reserves




 Issued ordinary share capital *

1,000

1,200
 Share premium account*

  400

   600
 Accumulated profits

  168

   322


1,568

2,122








* The additional share capital was issued on 1 April 2006.

Required:

(a) Calculate, for each of the two years,  eight accounting ratios which should assist the directors in their comparison, using closing figures for balance sheet items concerned.
                                                                                                                   (12 Marks)

(b) Suggest possible reasons for the changes in the ratios between the two years.
                                                                                                                   (8 Marks)
                                                                                                                     (20 Marks)

No comments:

Post a Comment